用户名: 密码:  用户登录   新用户注册  忘记密码  账号激活
您的位置:教学资源网 >> 试题 >> 英语试题
高中英语编辑
(人教版)新教材2021-2022英语选择性必修第一册检测:UNIT 2 LOOKING INTO THE FUTURE (二) Learning About Language Word版(英语 解析版)
下载扣金币方式下载扣金币方式
需消耗1金币 立即下载
0个贡献点 立即下载
0个黄金点 立即下载
VIP下载通道>>>
提示:本自然月内重复下载不再扣除金币
  • 资源类别试题
    资源子类章节测试
  • 教材版本人教版(新教材)
    所属学科高中英语
  • 适用年级高二年级
    适用地区全国通用
  • 文件大小939 K
    上传用户baibai9088
  • 更新时间2021/12/3 9:06:17
    下载统计今日0 总计0
  • 评论(0)发表评论  报错(0)我要报错  收藏
0
0
资源简介

A

Sir John Gurdon, a British scientist, who won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2012, said he had predicted at the time of his frog experiments that the successful cloning of a mammal would happen within 50 years, and that “maybe the same answer is appropriate” for the step to human cloning.Parents who lose children in accidents may be able to clone “copies” to replace them then.

Although any attempt to clone an entire human would raise complex moral issues, the biologist claimed people would soon overcome their concerns if the technique became medically useful.Cloning was regarded with extreme doubts when it was first developed but became widely accepted after the birth of Louise Brown, the firsttest­tube babyHe saidWhen my first frog experiments were done, an American reporter asked how long it would be before these things could be done in mammals or humans.I saidWell, it could be anytime between 10 years and 100 years — how about 50 years It turned out that it wasn't far off the mark as far as Dolly was concerned.Maybe the same answer is appropriate. Sir John added that cloning a human being effectively means making an identical twin, and doctors would therefore simply be “copying what nature has already produced”

The average vote on allowing parents of deceased children, who are no longer fertile(能生育的), to create another by using the mother's eggs and skin cells from the first child, thinking the technique was safe and effective, is 60 percent in favor.The reasons for “no” are usually that the new children would feel they are some sort of replacements for something.

语篇解读本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了诺贝尔生理学或医学奖得主、英国科学家约翰·格登爵士称,那些在事故中失去子女的父母将有可能在未来50年内借助克隆技术得到孩子的复制品

1Sir John predicted the human cloning would be a reality in      at most.

Aabout 100 years                    Babout 60 years

Cabout 50 years                            Dabout 10 years

解析:C 细节理解题。根据第一段可知,约翰·格登爵士表示,在未来50年内,那些在事故中失去孩子的父母将有可能通过克隆技术得到孩子的复制品。故选C项。

2According to the text, which statement is NOT true?

ALouise Brown is the first test­tube baby

BHuman cloning is still a controversial topic.

CSir John is positive about the future of human cloning.

DHuman cloning is creating something that didn't exist before.

解析:D 细节理解题。根据第二段中的after the birth of Louise Brown, the first test­tube baby可排除A项;文章尾段说明赞成者占6成,故排除B项;根据第二段中约翰·格登爵士的话可知,他对克隆人充满了希望,故排除C项;根据第二段的尾句可知,D项表述不正确。

3The underlined word “identical” probably means “     

Asame                                         Bspecial

Cnew                                          Dclear

解析:A 词义猜测题。根据画线词后的twin和后文的doctors would therefore simply be copying what nature has already produced可知,A项正确。

4It can be inferred from the passage that    

Amost people cast doubt on John's experiments

Bhuman cloning is and will be only a dream

Cfew children love to be cloned in the future

Dhuman cloning may be realized someday

解析:D 推理判断题。根据第二段第一句可知,虽然克隆人类的尝试将引起复杂的道德问题,但是生物学家声称如果克隆技术变得有医学价值,人们很快就会消除他们的担心,因此可推断D项正确。

  • 暂时没有相关评论

请先登录网站关闭

  忘记密码  新用户注册