A
(2018苏锡常镇调研)
As countless unmade beds and unfinished homework assignments prove,kids need rules.Yet how parents make demands can powerfully influence a child’s social skills,psychologists at the University of Virginia recently found after the conclusion of a study investigating the transition from adolescence to adulthood.
Initially 184 13-year-olds filled out multiple surveys,including one to assess how often their parents employed psychologically controlling strategies,such as inducing guilt or threatening to withdraw affection.The kids rated,for example,how typical it would be for Dad to suggest that “ if I really cared for him,I would not do things that caused him to worry ” or for Mom to become “less friendly when I did not see things her way.”
The researchers followed up with the subjects at ages 18 and 21,asking the young adults to bring along a close friend and,later,a romantic partner if they had one.These pairs were asked to answer hypothetical (假设的) questions that were purposefully written to inspire a difference of opinion.“We wanted to see whether they could navigate a disagreement in a healthy way,”says study leader Barbara Oudekerk,now at the U.S. Department of Justice’s bureau of statistics.
In the October issue of Child Development,Oudekerk and her colleagues report that the 13-year-olds who had highly controlling parents struggled in friendly disagreements at age 18.They had difficulty stating their opinions in a confident, reasoned manner in comparison to the kids without controlling parents.And when they did speak up,they often failed to express themselves in warm and productive ways.
The researchers suspect that pushy parents ruin their child’s ability to learn how to argue his or her own viewpoint in other relationships.Although parents do need to set boundaries,domineering strategies imply that any disagreement will damage the bond itself.Separate findings suggest that parents who explain the reasons behind their rules and turn disagreements into conversations leave youngsters better prepared for future arguments.
The consequences of tense or domineering relationships appear to get worse with time.This study also found that social difficulties at 18 predicted even poorer communication abilities at age 21.Psychologist Shmuel Shulman of Bar-Ilan University in Israel,who did not participate in the work,thinks these conclusions convincingly reveal how relationship patterns “carry forward” into new friendships.
1.What will happen to the teenagers with pushy parents?
A.They lose social skills.
B.They have trouble presenting opinions.
C.They express themselves in an aggressive way.
D.They fail to inspire a difference of opinion.
2.What does the underlined word “domineering” in Paragraph 5 mean?
A.alternative B.conservative
C.powerful D.forceful
3.It can be inferred from the findings that parents should .
A.communicate with children when setting rules
B.learn new ways to establish new friendships
C.seek more controlling strategies D.help children develop abilities to follow rules.
语篇解读:本文是说明文。讲述了强势的父母培养出来的孩子在观点表达方面往往比较困难,与他人沟通存在障碍。
答案及剖析:
1.B 细节理解题。根据第四段“They had difficulty stating their opinions...in warm and productive ways”和第五段“The researchers suspect...in other relationships” 可知强势的父母培养出来的孩子在观点表达方面有困难。
2.D 猜测词义题。根据画线单词后的“any disagreement will damage the bond itself,”及前一句中的“pushy”可知画线单词意为“强势的”。
3.A 推理判断题。根据第五段“Separate findings suggest...for future arguments”可知父母应与孩子交流规则背后的原因,故选A。
